What fewer Android phones could mean for consumers | Wifi Walker, J B Chaparal Properties

What fewer Android phones could meant for consumers

For a final several years, Android OEMs have managed to inundate a smartphone marketplace with handset after handset. Within weeks of a recover of one flagship device, possibly a same association or a aspirant will recover a new phone that steals all of a courtesy from all of a inclination before it. Motorola, HTC and Samsung are guilty of this when it comes to smartphones in a US, and we’ve also witnessed matching trends picking adult in a inscription space by Acer and Samsung.

That said, 2012 is moulding adult to be a improved year for mobile. Heading a container is HTC, who has finished a guarantee for reduction phones in a destiny – peculiarity over quantity. Instead of releasing 30 phones in a 12-month span, they will concentration on formulating fewer phones with significantly aloft quality. According to a news from Digitimes on Monday, Acer will also be jumping on a quality bandwagon.

While we have my doubts about HTC indeed creation a switch so fast – their explain is to have one flagship device in a initial half of 2012, nonetheless we’ve already schooled of 3 rumored high-end handsets from them – it could meant many things for a smartphone market, generally if other OEMs follow suit. In theory, what would happen?

Below are a few things we can design if manufacturers start to select peculiarity over quantity:


Less pointless quirks or bugs

In new memory, we can’t remember many Android phones that have expelled but some arrange of bug or glitch. For example, several HTC phones have come with audio bugs that make recording video with any audio a strike or miss. And when it comes to software, bugs are commonplace, generally when it comes to tradition interfaces like TouchWiz, Motorola Applications Platform and Sense UI.

With a tiny some-more caring and courtesy before withdrawal a seminar and with OEMs in reduction of a precipitate to pull out some-more and some-more phones, both hardware and program glitches will (hopefully) turn reduction or a problem. we wouldn’t design them to totally disappear; it’s unfit to exterminate bugs and glitches completely. But we consider it’s protected to contend they competence seem reduction often. And we don’t suppose many will disagree with that.


Faster program updates

From a really commencement of Android, program updates have been a sum mess. We insincere that a Android Update Alliance, that was shaped progressing this year, would assistance pull updates along a tiny quicker and safeguard updates for comparison devices. But now that a vital update has strike and any OEM has oral on a issue, we’re commencement to see that a fondness has finished tiny repair a superb issues. Devices from usually final year, like a Galaxy S and strange Galaxy Tab, will not strictly see Ice Cream Sandwich, that is, unless Samsung finds it probable in a reevaluation.

The problem has developed from dawdling on a manufacturers‘ partial to a inability to keep adult with updates on all of a devices. It’s flattering easy to comprehend that updating 40 opposite phones, any to a customized chronicle of software, can means a effort to start pier up. With fewer phones to update, we can during slightest wish that updates come quicker and to some-more phones. Don’t reason your breath, though.


Larger jumps in technology, phones that have it all

Incrementalization has been a approach of Android OEMs in 2011. A ideal instance is a Motorola’s DROID lineup on Verzion Wireless. The DROID X2, DROID 3, DROID BIONIC and DROID RAZR all share intensely matching specifications, and aside from a plane sliding, earthy QWERTY on a DROID 3, they all demeanour remarkably similar, too. In short, Motorola and Verizon could have gotten divided with usually releasing dual of these, nonetheless they’re not interlude during four. Two some-more are entrance – a DROID RAZR Maxx and DROID 4. And it’s easy to assume these will usually have teenager upgrades over a existent models, a improved arrangement or somewhat faster time speed on a processor.

Since all of these scarcely matching inclination have been rising so closely together, OEMs have been stepping on their possess toes, formulating foe within their possess lineups. To make such surrogate inclination during slightest a tiny appealing, they have been famous to give flagships a bruise spot. An Achilles’ heel, if we will. Take a Sensation 4G as an example. It came with usually 768MB RAM and 1GB built-in storage. Four months later, a successor, a Amaze 4G, expelled with 1GB RAM and 16GB built-in storage. The rest of a differences between a dual inclination are negligible.

Fewer inclination would clearly put an finish to this nonsense. Instead of no boost in RAM, immaterial changes in camera record or a tiny burst in CPU time speed (1GHz to 1.2GHz), we will see leaps or vast strides (read: not baby steps) in technology.


Less phones to review, reduction to select from

While many of a side-effects of fewer phones are all benefits, there are some disadvantages to not carrying so many phones to select from.

Unfortunately or us, there will be reduction phones to review. This isn’t all negative, as it can be incited into a positive. It’s usually … bittersweet. The certain side? Less phones means that particular inclination will get some-more hands-on time, a some-more in-depth demeanour and some-more phones can be pitted opposite competing devices. So instead of an contentment of reviews, there would be some-more time that we wouldn’t routinely have to concentration on particular aspects of a device. And dogfights galore.

These disadvantages aren’t specific to reviewers, though. It also will impact we guys, a consumers. With smaller selections to select from, your preference creation routine will positively turn reduction convoluted. However, a chances of anticipating a ideal device for we are smaller. With 15 variations of a singular device, a contingency of during one appealing to we are flattering high. On a other hand, reduction variations increases a contingency of we not anticipating a device we want. Of course, with phones that “have it all” could also solve that.


Tell me, readers. Aside from an boost in quality, what do we design from fewer phones? Would we like to see a same device make a approach to all vital carriers? Faster updates? Sound off in a comments below!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.