FCC report says T-Mobile, other carriers overstated their coverage maps | Wifi Walker, J B Chaparal Properties

FCC news says T-Mobile, other carriers farfetched their coverage maps

PhoneDog Media ExclusiveDownload iM5, now accessible in a App Store and Google Play. iM5 is a PhoneDog Media corroborated Social Platform to enthuse real-life movement by a crowdsourcing of ideas. See a video


A new FCC news says that T-Mobile and other U.S. carriers skewed their farming coverage.

The FCC conducted expostulate tests of T-Mobile, Verizon, and U.S. Cellular’s networks and found that they usually achieved a smallest download speeds expected by those carriers’ coverage maps 62.3% of a time. T-Mobile privately achieved that speed in 63.2% of tests, Verizon in 64.3% of tests, and U.S. Cellular only 45.0% of tests.

According to a report, FCC staff was incompetent to get any 4G LTE vigilance from T-Mobile for 21.3% of a expostulate tests, notwithstanding T-Mobile stating that it had coverage in a area. The FCC couldn’t find a Verizon LTE vigilance in 16.2% of a expostulate tests, while a U.S. Cellular network unsuccessful to furnish an LTE vigilance in 38% of a FCC’s expostulate tests.

Stationary tests weren’t most better. FCC staff found that any conduit achieved sufficient download speeds assembly a smallest dungeon corner luck in only 20 of 42 locations.

In a testing, FCC staff totalled network opening in 12 states opposite 6 expostulate exam routes. They conducted 24,649 tests and gathering scarcely 10,000 miles. The FCC staffers also conducted 5,916 still speed tests during 42 locations in 9 states.

The exam came about since a carriers submitted coverage maps so that a FCC could establish areas authorised for support in a Mobility Fund Phase II (MF-II) auction, though some parties lifted concerns that a maps might not be accurate. Based on those complaints and a possess review, FCC staff were endangered that coverage maps submitted by Verizon, U.S. Cellular, and T-Mobile might have been overstated.

“Through a investigation, staff detected that a MF-II coverage maps submitted by Verizon, U.S. Cellular, and T-Mobile expected farfetched any provider’s tangible coverage and did not simulate on-the-ground opening in many instances,” a FCC explains.

It can be frustrating when a carrier’s coverage map says that you’ll have use in a sold area though afterwards we find that it’s not there. The FCC is generally endangered with this matter since it relies on conduit coverage maps to assistance it establish where a appropriation should go to assistance urge things in areas that need that support.

“Overstating mobile broadband coverage misleads a open and can misallocate a singular concept use funds, and this it contingency be met with suggestive consequences,” a FCC news says. The group goes on to make some recommendations about what should be finished to pill this issue, observant things like carriers should be compulsory to contention on-the-ground justification of network opening that countenance a propagation indication used to beget coverage maps.

I’ve contacted T-Mobile for a criticism on this FCC news though haven’t nonetheless listened back. I’ll refurbish this post if a matter is issued. In a meant time, we can check out a full news for yourself.


UPDATE: T-Mobile gave me a following matter per a FCC’s report:

“We mount behind a network coverage and all of a maps, though determine with a FCC that there is an event to urge their procedures for collection of broadband coverage information for a Mobility Fund maps. We demeanour brazen to operative with them and Congress to revamp a process.”


Via: Mike Dano (Twitter)
Source: FCC

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.